Delaware State Courts
   home | feedback 
  search
Delaware State Courts.  The Official Website of the Delaware Judiciary
Delaware State Courts

 Supreme Court Home

 Administrative Directives

 Committees

 Court Calendar

 eFiling

 History

 Hours and Locations

 Judicial Officers

 Opinions & Orders

 Oral Argument  Recordings:
 Video
| Audio

 Press Releases

 Rules


Photo of the Supreme Court Courthouse in Dover

Welcome to the Delaware Supreme Court

      The Delaware Supreme Court is the highest court in the State of Delaware. The Court has final appellate jurisdiction in criminal cases in which the sentence exceeds certain minimums, in civil cases as to final judgments and for certain other orders of the Court of Chancery, the Superior Court, and the Family Court. The Supreme Court has discretionary jurisdiction to issue writs of prohibition, quo warranto, certiorari, mandamus or to accept appeals of certain non-final orders or certified questions. Learn about oral argument procedures in the Supreme Court.


Supreme Court News

Delaware Supreme Court Adopts Delaware Rapid Arbitration Rulesnew icon

By an order dated June 17, 2015, the Delaware Supreme Court has adopted, in consultation with the Court of Chancery, the Delaware Rapid Arbitration Rules (“Rules”) to govern the procedure in arbitrations  under the recently-enacted Delaware Rapid Arbitration Act, 10 Del. C. § 5801 et seq. (“DRAA”).  The Rules are effective June 22, 2015 and are available on the Delaware State Courts’ website.

The Rules set forth the procedures for arbitrations under the DRAA.  The Rules address, among other things, commencement of an arbitration under the DRAA, the authority of the arbitrator, the scheduling and order of arbitration proceedings, the confidentiality of arbitration proceedings, and the form of a final award.  The parties to an arbitration under the DRAA may agree, with the consent of the arbitrator, to modify the Rules or adopt additional rules, as long as no modification or addition is inconsistent with the DRAA.  The Court may amend the Rules at any time. 

If you have any questions, please contact William S. Montgomery, Supreme Court Administrator, at william.montgomery@state.de.us or (302) 577-8742.


Amendment to Delaware Supreme Court Internal Operating Proceduresnew icon

The Supreme Court has revised its Internal Operating Procedures.  As the procedures themselves make clear, they are designed to provide a useful description of how the Court operates in the usual course of events.  The procedures are not intended to take the place of constitutional, statutory, or procedural rules that apply to cases.  Instead, the procedures set forth how the Court generally handles the processing of cases, the scheduling of oral argument, and internal deliberations.

The updated procedures are largely consistent with the existing procedures, but have been streamlined and updated: (i) to eliminate provisions that simply repeated sections of the Court’s Rules; (ii) to address how the Court has operated in the past decade when technology has increased the easier flow of information; (iii) to create more flexibility in internal communications, deliberations, and preparation for oral arguments, while retaining the important ethos that all key decision-making communications include everyone involved in the entire panel assigned to case; and (iv) to eliminate outdated provisions that no longer reflect how the Court has operated in the past decade.

The Supreme Court Internal Operating Procedures are available on the Rules of the Delaware State Courts website.


Delaware Supreme Court Amends Delaware Supreme Court Rules 3, 9, 25, 29, 30, and 43new icon

By an order dated May 20, 2015, the Delaware Supreme Court has amended Supreme Court Rules 3, 9, 25, 29, 30, and 43.  These amendments are effective June 1, 2015.  The purpose of these amendments is to clarify and to bring into conformity with actual practice the use of motions to affirm under Rule 25 and motions to dismiss under Rule 29. 

As to criminal appeals, Rule 25 has been amended to  eliminate the ability of an appellee to bring a motion to affirm as to direct appeals from convictions after trial and first motions for postconviction relief under Superior Court Rule 61 when there is a conviction after trial.  Motions to affirm remain permitted as to other criminal appeals.  In the categories where motions to affirm would no longer be permitted, the appellee may file an earlier answering brief if it wishes quicker disposition. 

As to civil appeals, experience has shown that motions to affirm are rarely, if ever, granted, especially if the appeal has been filed through counsel.  Rule 25 has been amended to eliminate the option to file a motion to affirm in a civil case, other than one from an appeal of a denial of a petition for an extraordinary writ.  Experience has shown that the motion to affirm tool has been efficiently and consistently used in this category of appeals.  If there is a genuine need for expedited proceedings, the option of filing a motion for expedition remains. An appellee may also may file an earlier answering brief if it wishes quicker disposition.

Similarly, Rule 29 has been amended to eliminate the option to bring a motion to dismiss an appeal.  The Court retains the ability to grant a dismissal motion sua sponte, under the same conditions that currently exist.  As with motions to affirm in civil cases, motions to dismiss have rarely been made or granted in the Supreme Court.  If an appellee believes an appeal should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or some other non-merits reason,that argument can be made in its answering brief.  If the appellee believes that the appeal should move faster, the appellee can file its answering brief earlier. 

Conforming amendments have been made to Rules 3, 9, 30, and 43 to make them consistent with the revised Rule 29.

If you have any questions, please contact William S. Montgomery, Supreme Court Administrator, at william.montgomery@state.de.us or (302) 577-8742.


Amendments to Delaware Supreme Court Rule 26 and Superior Court Criminal Rule 61 Related to Court-Appointed Postconviction Counselnew icon

 The Delaware Supreme Court has amended its Rule 26 and the Superior Court has amended its Criminal Rule 61 to clarify the continuing obligations of a court-appointed postconviction lawyer if the Superior Court grants the lawyer’s motion to withdraw as postconviction counsel.

 The Superior Court has amended is Criminal Rule 61(e) to add a new subsection (6)(i), which specifies the obligations that the court-appointed lawyer owes to the client if the lawyer’s motion to withdraw as counsel is granted before final disposition of the motion for postconviction relief.  The Superior Court also has amended Rule 61(e) to add a new subsection (6)(ii), which specifies the obligations that the court-appointed lawyer owes to the client if the lawyer’s motion to withdraw as counsel is granted simultaneously to the Superior Court’s final disposition of the motion for postconviction relief.

The Supreme Court has amended its Rule 26 to clarify that, if the court-appointed postconviction lawyer is permitted to withdraw as counsel by the Superior Court, then the court-appointed counsel’s continuing obligations to the client on appeal are limited to those duties set forth in Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(e)(6).


The Delaware Judiciary Creates the Judicial Strategies Committee to Focus on Long-Term Planning for the Delaware Courts new icon

In order to better prepare to meet the challenges of the future, the Delaware Judiciary has created the Judicial Strategies Committee to guide the long-term strategic planning for the State Court System.

The Committee represents a collaborative approach by the Judiciary in that the Committee will not only be comprised of the presiding judges of each of the State’s Courts and court staff but also key legislative leaders and members of the Bar.

With this broad-based membership, the Judiciary hopes to deepen its efforts to work closely with the Bar and the broader community, hear the views of those who use our judicial system, and to anticipate future challenges and propose thoughtful solutions.

Members of the Committee will include the current and immediate past president of the Delaware State Bar Association, the co-chairs of the Delaware Legislature’s Joint Finance Committee, the chairs of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the House Judiciary Committee along with a minority-party member of each of those committees to ensure bi-partisan representation.  Additional members may be appointed by the Chief Justice to represent the legal community and other important perspectives.

The Chief Justice will serve as the ex officio chair of the Judicial Strategies Committee, and the co-chairs will be the State Court Administrator along with a member of the Bar appointed by the Chief Justice.

The Committee will be responsible for long-term strategic planning for the Delaware Judiciary, including legislative matters and other emerging trends that affect the Delaware Courts and the justice system in Delaware and will develop policy-oriented solutions.

A Working Group of the Committee will be established to deal with urgent or day-to-day implementation issues related to the work of the Committee.

The Committee, established by a judicial order signed by Chief Justice Leo E. Strine, Jr. on May 21, will go into effect on July 1, 2015, at the conclusion of the current legislative term.  A copy of the order can be found here.


Amendments to the Delaware Supreme Court Rules and the Court of Chancery Rules Related to the Delaware Rapid Arbitration Act new icon

To implement aspects of the recently-enacted Delaware Rapid Arbitration Act, 10 Del. C. § 5801 et seq. (“DRAA”), the Delaware Supreme Court and the Court of Chancery have amended their rules.  These amendments are effective June 1, 2015.

The Supreme Court has amended Supreme Court Rules 6, 7, 9, and 32.  Rule 6 has been amended to include the time for an appeal or cross-appeal of a final award under the DRAA.  Rule 7 has been amended to include the procedures for an appeal of a final award under the DRAA.  Rule 9 has been amended to clarify the record on appeal of a final award under the DRAA.  Rule 32 has been amended to include the procedure for a stay or injunction pending appeal of a final award under the DRAA. 

Court of Chancery Rules 96-98 also have been amended.  Rule 96 establishes the process for commencing a summary proceeding to appoint an arbitrator under the DRAA in certain circumstances, such as when the parties cannot agree on an arbitrator.  Rule 97 governs proceedings under the DRAA to enforce subpoenas, determine an arbitrator’s fees and enter judgment after arbitration.  Rule 98 was removed in its entirety and is reserved for future use.

The Supreme Court and Court of Chancery amendments are available on the Rules page.


Delaware Supreme Court Amends Delaware Supreme Court Rule 42 and Official Form L

By an order dated April 30, 2015, the Delaware Supreme Court has amended Supreme Court Rule 42 and Official Form L.  These amendments are effective May 15, 2015. 

Supreme Court Rule 42 has been rewritten to provide more guidance regarding when the Court will consider an interlocutory appeal.  It remains the case that the grant of an interlocutory appeal will be the exception, rather than the rule, and that even if a particular case meets one of the criteria identified in the rule, it does not necessarily mean that an interlocutory appeal will be granted.  The Committee and the Court will review the operation of the rule amendments after one year to determine whether further amendment is necessary to discourage meritless applications to the trial court and this Court.

If you have any questions, please contact William S. Montgomery, Supreme Court Administrator, at william.montgomery@state.de.us or (302) 577-8742.


The Honorable Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Takes the Oath of Office for Justice of the Supreme Court of Delaware May 1, 2015

 


Scales of Justice photo
Board of Bar Examiners
Considers applications for admission and results of examinations for admissions to the Delaware State Bar
Board of Bar Examiners
BBE

Commission on Continuing Legal Education
Administers legal education compliance for members of the Delaware State Bar

Commission on Continuing Legal Education
CLE

Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection
Provides monetary relief to clients who have suffered financial losses as result of dishonest lawyer conduct
Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection
LFCP

Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Regulates the practice of law by evaluating, investigating and prosecuting lawyer misconduct for the Court
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
ODC

Commission on Law and Technology
Provides Delaware Lawyers with guidance and education in the aspects of technology and the practice of law.
CLT
CLT


Links of Interest:
Icon denoting Judicial Ethics Advisory Opinions
Judicial Ethics Advisory Opinions Advisory opinions issued by the Delaware Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee
Icon denoting Annual Registration
Icon denoting Annual and Statistical Reports
Annual and Statistical Reports
Find annual and statistical data for
the Supreme Court
Icon denoting Clerkship
2016-2017 Clerkshippdf icon new icon
Notice for third year law students seeking Judicial Clerkships with the Delaware Supreme Court
Icon denoting Bar Bench Media
Bar Bench Media Conference
Members, meetings, minutes, ethics,and general information
Judicial Ethics Advisory Opinions