|
Case Summary: Mother petitioned the Court to be allowed
to move her and her child to Florida. However, before the Court
ruled, Mother moved to Florida. The Court ordered Mother to return
and a hearing was held on the matter. The Court looked to the Model
Relocation Act proposed by the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers
even though it had not been adopted by the Delaware General Assembly.
The Act required the Court to consider each party's relationship
with the child, the age and developmental stage of the child, the
feasibility of preserving the other parent's relationship with the
child, the child's preference, whether there is a pattern of relocation
designed to thwart the other parent's relationship with the child,
whether the proposed move would enhance the quality of the child's
life and the reason for relocation. The Court considered the following
relevant facts. Father had a job working five days a week, a wife
and another child. Mother currently worked until 8 or 9 at night
resulting in maternal grandmother caring for the child after school.
If Mother was allowed to move to Florida, she would receive a higher
paying job where she would be done at 4:30 in the afternoon and
the schools in Florida were better. The Court found that most of
these facts were in favor of the Mother relocating and authorized
the move. However, since Mother had originally moved without permission
of the Court, the Court effectuated only a temporary order which
would be reviewed prior to the start of the following school year.
Back
to Case Law
|